> (2) there are now many (6) files associated with a single index.
> Suggestion: make the index a directory instead of a file, so you would
> run like:
> swish-e -f path/to/index.swish-e
> but index.swish-e is a directory, not a file.
before incremental indexing (which is a great feature that i have been
waiting for to be stable), there were just 2 files. so i could do my
logical grouping of indexing and dump all the files into a folder.
then when its time to do swish, could just use a wildcard to search all
of the files.
if each folder was separate, like with lucene, then i guess i would have
to use bash script to reiterate through folders.
my vote is not impose a folder structure and let the implementation
handle it. some would dump all into one folder (like me). others
might create folders and have a way of managing that.
excellent work with swish. i have evaluated many indexing systems (as
well as have used swish for eons) and swish has been the easiest to use,
keep up the great work.
Users mailing list
Received on Mon Oct 19 13:25:22 2009