Skip to main content.
home | support | download

Back to List Archive


From: Peter Karman <peter(at)>
Date: Wed Nov 28 2007 - 16:02:38 GMT
On 11/28/2007 09:10 AM, J Robinson wrote:
> Thanks for the response, peter:
> My understanding is that building a too-large index with swish-e on either
> 1) a large-file enabled swish-e on a non-large-file filesystem or 2) a
> non-large-file enabled swish-e
> will result in about about the same error (core dump). So in that respect, I
> don't see a problem with enabling the large-file options with swish-e, even
> on a non-64-bit filesystem. Right?

as I read (1), it's an issue to enable the feature on 32-bit (or smaller)

> I think the issue might be more that large-file-support indexes are slightly
> larger or slower (though I'm not positive this is even true). The big index
> support is a big win for those who need it!
> Interested to hear more on the subject, jrobinson

I don't use the feature myself. I was basing my fs-detection suggestion on
these threads:

Peter Karman  .  peter(at)  .

Users mailing list
Received on Wed Nov 28 11:02:38 2007