Skip to main content.
home | support | download

Back to List Archive


From: J Robinson <jrobinson852(at)>
Date: Wed Nov 28 2007 - 15:10:34 GMT
Thanks for the response, peter:

My understanding is that building a too-large index with swish-e on either 

1) a large-file enabled swish-e on a non-large-file filesystem
2) a non-large-file enabled swish-e 

will result in about about the same error (core dump). So in that respect, I don't see a problem with enabling the large-file options with swish-e, even on a non-64-bit filesystem. Right?

I think the issue might be more that large-file-support indexes are slightly larger or slower (though I'm not positive this is even true). The big index support is a big win for those who need it!

Interested to hear more on the subject,

Peter Karman <> wrote:

If we could detect 64-bit filesystem arch at ./configure time, this
 could be
automatically added.

Dave? Bill?

On 11/27/2007 03:37 PM, J Robinson wrote:
> Hello, All:
> I was hoping that the swish-e developers could make the
> large file support options
>  the default for the next version of swish-e. 
> I've been using those flags on swish-e since august 2005.
> Thoughts?

Be a better pen pal. 
Text or chat with friends inside Yahoo! Mail. See how.
Users mailing list
Received on Wed Nov 28 10:10:35 2007