> I am a FC user too, and I think it's great that you are volunteering to create
> and host RPMs. Thanks.
You are welcome.
> 2.4.4 has some bugs in it that I would rather not see propagated out in
> something like an RPM.
> This is the Swish-e license:
> Believe it.
> That said, the Swish-e license is totally compatible with creating and
> re-distributing RPMs.
Okay. That sounds good.
Right now I have two packages for SWISH-e itself and the Perl-API Module
"SWISH::API" since SWISH-e is a build requirement for the Perl-API.
Do you think this split-up is reasonable? Or shall I bundle this into
Received on Thu Jan 11 11:49:19 2007