Peter, James,

> I am a FC user too, and I think it's great that you are volunteering to create 
> and host RPMs. Thanks.

You are welcome.

> 2.4.4 has some bugs in it that I would rather not see propagated out in 
> something like an RPM.

Agreed.

> This is the Swish-e license:
> http://swish-e.org/license.html
> 
> Believe it.

I will!

> That said, the Swish-e license is totally compatible with creating and 
> re-distributing RPMs.

Okay. That sounds good.

Right now I have two packages for SWISH-e itself and the Perl-API Module
"SWISH::API" since SWISH-e is a build requirement for the Perl-API.

Do you think this split-up is reasonable?  Or shall I bundle this into
one package?


Simon