Skip to main content.
home | support | download

Back to List Archive

Re: word present in index but not returned in search results

From: K. Dean Grant <dean.grant(at)not-real.gmail.com>
Date: Wed Jan 11 2006 - 19:00:11 GMT
We are trying to convince the users to move to another system and are
therefore uni-interested in upgrading.

I'm not sure what you mean when you say it might be indexed under a
different meta name. The word in the example I gave, "apple", was just a
regular word in the body of the HTML file and that is how it appeared in th=
e
decoded index file.

Dean

On 1/11/06, Bill Moseley <moseley@hank.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 09:04:53AM -0800, K. Dean Grant wrote:
> > We have an older installation of Swish-e (1.3). The system has worked
> well
> > enough, but recently a problem has been identified by one of our users.
> A
> > couple of words which are within the document set do not return any
> results=3D
>
> Upgrade.
>
> > I have decoded the index file and have found that at least one of the
> words
> > in question does appear in the index:
> >
> > apple: 5 5800 15 1 6 5800 15 1 106 5800 15 1 934 5800 15 1 2040 5800 15
> 1
> > 2073 5800 15 1 2096 5800 15 1 2306 5800 15 1 2353 5800 15 1 2762 5800 1=
5
> 1
> > 3310 5800 15 1 4348 5800 15 1
> >
> > However, when I perform a search on the index using this word no result=
s
> ar=3D
> > e
> > displayed:
>
> Mabye it's indexed under a differnt metaname?
>
> --
> Bill Moseley
> moseley@hank.org
>
> Unsubscribe from or help with the swish-e list:
>    http://swish-e.org/Discussion/
>
> Help with Swish-e:
>    http://swish-e.org/current/docs
>    swish-e@sunsite.berkeley.edu
>
>



*********************************************************************
Due to deletion of content types excluded from this list by policy,
this multipart message was reduced to a single part, and from there
to a plain text message.
*********************************************************************
Received on Wed Jan 11 11:00:11 2006