Skip to main content.
home | support | download

Back to List Archive

Re: lucene/plucene

From: Bill Moseley <moseley(at)not-real.hank.org>
Date: Mon May 09 2005 - 16:44:49 GMT
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 09:27:34AM -0700, Bernhard Weisshuhn wrote:
> Peter Karman wrote:
> 
> > Plucene I have only read about; I love Perl, but for performance reasons, I just 
> > can't imagine using Plucene in any kind of production environment. Hobbyists, 
> > personal websites, etc., seem fine, but Perl just isn't robust enough, imo, to 
> > stand up against Lucene (Java) or Swish-e (C).
> 
> Jehovah! Jehovah! Let the flames begin!
> Whoever mentions the term 'classpath' first, loses!
> Whoops, that would be me then :-)
> 
> I for one happen to know quite a few hardcore mission critical perl 
> applications running at telcos and also some very unstable J2EE 
> applications (yes, also vice-versa...)

I think he was talking about Plucene, not Perl in general.

-- 
Bill Moseley
moseley@hank.org

Unsubscribe from or help with the swish-e list: 
   http://swish-e.org/Discussion/

Help with Swish-e:
   http://swish-e.org/current/docs
   swish-e@sunsite.berkeley.edu
Received on Mon May 9 09:44:51 2005