> Does this come close?
I saw that... Yeah, it does come close... The since the real power of
spidering is in the customization of the spider, it would be nice if
that section would contain a 'sane default' spider.conf file. It can be
overwhelming to a novice user just being dropped at an all inclusive
list of options. Took me a little while to figure out what was
important, and what wasn't...
Some thing like the included sample file, with the comments and some
I hope I don't sound like I'm ragging on the docs... They're
wonderfully comprehensive... Its just that when you getting started,
it's a bit overwhelming...
[mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org] On Behalf Of Bill Moseley
Sent: Sunday, August 29, 2004 6:47 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list
Subject: [SWISH-E] Re:
On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 01:10:38PM -0700, Shaffer, Chris wrote:
> I had a similar situation. Because some of our sites are dynamic in
> nature, we chose to go with spidering. However, I found some
> documentation around setting up spidering a little confusing (there
> was a lot of it, it was just ordered a little weird). I think what
> the documentation could use is a Spidering Getting Started Guide.
Doesn't really describe how to customize the spider, though, other than
Detailed instructions on using the swish.cgi script and debugging tips
can be found by running:
$ perldoc swish.cgi
I understand that it can be confusing, so let me know if you have any
suggestions or edits.
> # Only index .html .htm and .q files
> IndexOnly .html .htm .txt
IndexOnly does nothing in this case -- the spider determines what files
Unsubscribe from or help with the swish-e list:
Help with Swish-e:
Received on Mon Aug 30 07:28:42 2004