oh yes I miss it...
thanks it works






Bill Moseley <moseley@hank.org>
28/02/2003 16:19

 
        To:     David THOMAS <david.thomas@alti.lu>
        cc:     Multiple recipients of list <swish-e@sunsite.berkeley.edu>
        Subject:        Re: [SWISH-E] Re: Timestamp and -L option


On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, David THOMAS wrote:

> swish-e -f index.swish-e -w "d*" -d @@@@@ -p DATE ABROGE -s DATE desc -m 

> 1000 -L DATE 922575600 1048806000 -L VALID 0 0
> 
> # SWISH format: 2.2.3
> # Search words: d*
> err: Failed to setup limit by property: Property 'date' value 
'922575600' 
> must be <= '1048806000'

You missed my original response where I said "zero pad"?

You are comparing *strings*.

  9 is greater than 1

moseley@bumby:~/swish-e/src$ swish-e -f index.swish-e -w "d*"  -p DATE
ABROGE -s DATE desc -m 1000 -L DATE 0922575600 1048806000
# SWISH format: 2.3.4
# Search words: d*
# Removed stopwords: 
# Number of hits: 1
# Search time: 0.001 seconds
# Run time: 0.029 seconds
1000 1.html "Found me!" 124 "0922575600" ""
.

Also, using -L for that "valid" test is probably not the best way to go.
Make it a metaname and then use

   -w foo and valid=0




-- 
Bill Moseley moseley@hank.org






*********************************************************************
Due to deletion of content types excluded from this list by policy,
this multipart message was reduced to a single part, and from there
to a plain text message.
*********************************************************************