I guess I would have assumed
-w 'keywords=(blah) and (not blah)'
but I certainly could agree that the parenless version is
ambiguous. However, whichever way it's parsed, 2.0.5 still shouldn't be
bringing back any results, should it?
At 00:13 02-04-01, Bill Moseley wrote:
>At 01:41 PM 04/01/01 -0700, David Wood wrote:
> >Hi folks,
> >In an HMTL doc containing both <META NAME="keywords" CONTENT="blah"> and
> >the string 'blah' in the doc body, the following search:
> >-w "keywords=blah and not blah" finds the doc in 2.0.5 but does not in
> -w 'keywords=(bla) and (not blah)'
> -w 'keywords=(bla and not blah)'
Received on Sun Apr 1 22:31:39 2001