Skip to main content.
home | support | download

Back to List Archive

Re: Swish-e poor performance?

From: Paul J. Lucas <pjl(at)not-real.ptolemy.arc.nasa.gov>
Date: Fri Aug 28 1998 - 07:30:23 GMT
On Thu, 27 Aug 1998, Lars' Local Account wrote:

> I had to give up, because after 18 hours it was still churning away. ...  Are
> there any faster alternative out there?

	It is for the above reason that I wrote SWISH++ (a link for
	which is available via the SWISH-E site).

	- Paul J. Lucas
	  NASA Ames Research Center		Caelum Research Corporation
	  Moffett Field, California		San Jose, California
	  <pjl AT ptolemy DOT arc DOT nasa DOT gov>
Received on Fri Aug 28 00:40:36 1998